The participants are expected to incorporate in their lesson plans the topics discussed in the two-day seminar, including the Atty. Guia’s presentation.
The credibility of the process of election adjudication is as crucial in a democracy as the conduct of the election itself. The perception that no just, fair, and expeditious relief can be expected to correct a perceived wrong breeds public distrust in the whole electoral exercise.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Seminar on Automated Election System
The participants are expected to incorporate in their lesson plans the topics discussed in the two-day seminar, including the Atty. Guia’s presentation.
Prospects of Election Adjudication under an Automated System in the Philippines
COMELEC Education and Information Department Director, James Arthur B. Jimenez, presented the Automated Election System for the 2010 elections. This was followed by a discussion by Atty. Luie F. Guia of the Possible Areas of Dispute in Automated Election System. Former COMELEC Commissioner and Associate Justice of the Court of Appeals, Hon. Teresita Di-Liacco Flores and veteran election lawyer, Atty. Sixto V. Brillantes, contributed to the discussion by sharing their experiences and insights on the previous attempts of COMELEC to automate the elections.
The Future of Election Adjudication: Reflections on the Automated ARMM Elections
COMELEC Chairman Jose Melo sent Commissioner Leonardo Leonida and some top officials of the Commission, including Executive Director Jose Tolentino, Jr., to present the Commission’s views on the recently concluded automated ARMM Elections.
LENTE volunteers Krizna Gomez and Atty. Nasser Marohomsalic also gave their personal observations. Representatives from non-governmental organizations, the Senate Electoral Tribunal, election law practitioners, law students and machine providers also joined the discussion.






